A five-day evaluation plan that does not force five trading days
Five days is a review horizon, not a command to be 20% finished each day. A plan should constrain bad decisions when the clock feels loud.
The short answer
Start here
Choose the finish line and define the operating constraints before the first trade. Treat five sessions as your review horizon, not a deadline the software can enforce. Each day should produce a small number of valid moves, including “do not trade,” rather than a required amount of profit.
What matters
- A modeled ETA never creates a catch-up obligation.
- No-trade is a valid daily action when the setup or risk condition is absent.
- Close the day against process evidence before changing the plan.
01
Write the operating contract first
Before the first session, record the exact drawdown rule, any daily limit, the self-set loss ceiling and what qualifies as a valid setup. Decide what ends the day before a losing trade asks you to negotiate.
The firm’s maximum loss is not a daily target in reverse. Your operating ceiling can be stricter. It should be a number you chose, not a percentage NANO inferred from the account label.
02
Give each day one job
Day one can verify the rule and establish a clean baseline. A later day can execute only when the planned setup appears. Another can be a review day with no new risk. The sequence should respond to evidence, not force equal profit into equal calendar boxes.
If the account falls behind a model, the next action is to review inputs and behavior. It is never “trade more because the chart says behind.”
03
The common mistake
Do not rewrite the plan during the emotional peak of a red or unusually green session. Close the day, record the behavior, then change a constraint only with a named reason.
Worked example
Assumptions, not a forecastA five-day review horizon
- Member-chosen campaign loss ceiling: $600.
- Member-chosen per-trade stop-risk ceiling: $120.
- Review date: after five market sessions, whether or not five trades occurred.
The plan can permit zero to five trading days. The $120 ceiling allows at most five full planned losses before the $600 campaign ceiling, but no day is required to use that risk.
These are example member choices, not recommended limits. Commissions, slippage, gaps and simultaneous positions can increase realized loss.
Tool tutorial
Turn the horizon into today’s desk
- 01
Choose the next outcome that matches your desk. Before your first funded account, that can be Reach my first funded account; once funded evidence is logged, Plan Coach removes that completed milestone and asks for a new finish line.
- 02
Review the assumptions and evidence behind the current plan; do not treat the modeled ETA as a trading deadline.
- 03
Work through the desk’s small set of evidence-based moves for today, including no-trade or review actions.
- 04
At the close, save one line on what changed and optionally record whether you followed the plan or which mistake appeared.
Turn the goal into today’s valid moves
Plan Coach uses your current goal and logged evidence to surface up to three daily moves without creating a trade or profit quota.
Free account required. Goal choices follow the evidence on your desk; a completed first-funded milestone is not offered again. The model clock never requires a trade.
Evidence boundary
What NANO can and cannot know
NANO can organize your goal and logged evidence. It cannot see market conditions, validate a setup, choose a risk limit or promise that a horizon is achievable.
Common questions
- Should I divide the profit target by the number of days?
- No. That creates a daily profit quota that market conditions did not agree to provide. Use the date as a review point, not an instruction to force trades.
- Can a plan include no-trade days?
- Yes. A no-trade decision can be the correct execution of a plan when the setup, risk room or rule condition is absent.